brainstorms:research_computing_storage_infrastructure_2012
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| brainstorms:research_computing_storage_infrastructure_2012 [2012/05/25 15:56] – [Proposed architecture] aorth | brainstorms:research_computing_storage_infrastructure_2012 [2012/06/13 13:47] – aorth | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| * ICRAF site will have one controller (less critical storage) | * ICRAF site will have one controller (less critical storage) | ||
| * Capacity 12TB or 24TB (with usable space roughly half of each figure) | * Capacity 12TB or 24TB (with usable space roughly half of each figure) | ||
| + | * **June 13, 2012**: | ||
| + | * Got the quote back from GK at Techno Associates, two options: | ||
| + | * 12TB dual configurations: | ||
| + | * 24TB dual configurations: | ||
| + | * We need to talk to Ian Moore to see what he thinks | ||
| + | * It's possible we now use ICT's NetApp to provide 1-2TB for GIS server, then building some custom solution for the DMZ | ||
| ===== Proposed NetApp architecture ===== | ===== Proposed NetApp architecture ===== | ||
brainstorms/research_computing_storage_infrastructure_2012.txt · Last modified: 2012/07/24 06:57 by aorth