User Tools

Site Tools


brainstorms:research_computing_storage_infrastructure_2012

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
brainstorms:research_computing_storage_infrastructure_2012 [2012/05/25 09:40] aorthbrainstorms:research_computing_storage_infrastructure_2012 [2012/05/25 15:56] – [Proposed architecture] aorth
Line 22: Line 22:
       * ICRAF site will have one controller (less critical storage)       * ICRAF site will have one controller (less critical storage)
       * Capacity 12TB or 24TB (with usable space roughly half of each figure)       * Capacity 12TB or 24TB (with usable space roughly half of each figure)
 +
 +===== Proposed NetApp architecture =====
 +Proposed architecture assuming we expand ICT's existing NetApp rack with extra controllers and storage.
 +
 +{{ :brainstorms:research_computing_storage_2012.png?nolink |}}
 +
 +**Key points**:
 +  * Raw storage is sliced in several chunks and shared appropriately
 +  * NetApp exports CIFS shares to corporate clients and servers (users authenticate with Active Directory credentials)
 +  * NetApp exports iSCSI block devices to Linux servers in order to allow them to manage their own storage/access/users directly in the OS
 +
 +===== Alternatives =====
 +  * Build our own storage, ala Backblaze "pods": http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v2-0revealing-more-secrets/
 +  * Using FreeBSD + ZFS?
brainstorms/research_computing_storage_infrastructure_2012.txt · Last modified: 2012/07/24 06:57 by aorth